By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
Before adopting any new AI product, evaluate it against a multi-criteria rubric — not a polished demo or a colleague’s recommendation. The goal is a tool that genuinely fits your instruction and clears your district’s privacy bar.
Instructional Fit
Does the tool meet a genuine classroom need, or is it a solution in search of a problem?
Accuracy & Grounding
Does it provide verifiable sources so outputs can be checked and trusted?
Privacy & Data Handling
Does it protect student PII and comply with district policy and applicable law?
Admin Controls
Can the district manage settings, permissions, and user access at an administrative level?
Transparency
Is it clear what the tool does with your inputs — how data is stored, used, or shared?
Accessibility
Does it support English learners and students with diverse needs without added barriers?
Two things are non-negotiable: match the tool’s strengths to a real need, and confirm it meets your district’s minimum privacy standards. A tool that fails the privacy floor is a no — however impressive the rest.
A quick check on the evaluation rubric.